I started this Substack to share my thoughts and get feedback from other people. I’m hoping for thoughtful and respectful discussions. I discuss and debate issues with a few friends, mostly by email. I’m hoping to widen the number of participants in these interactions and make them more organized. I plan to write a free-standing essay every week or two, but my posts will mostly be extended comments on pieces of journalism I have read.
I am not a journalist or a scholar, but I am a lifelong political junkie. I remember when I was 12 years old in Vista, California, in the summer of 1956. I watched the Republican and Democratic national conventions live on my family’s first television, a 15-inch table model Hoffman. In the Democratic convention, the presidential candidate, Adlai Stevenson, broke with tradition and threw open the nomination for Vice President to the floor. A young Senator, Jack Kennedy from Massachusetts, threw his hat in the ring. There was a lot of excitement, but eventually, Senator Estes Kefauver of Tennessee clinched it. This was only the second time US political conventions had been televised.
When I registered to vote before the 1964 election, I registered Republican partly to poke my dad, a staunch New Deal Democrat, and partly as a tribute to my maternal grandfather, who was a progressive Republican. Another reason was that I believed in fiscal responsibility and social stability. So, I am something of an institutionalist. However, I never identified as a conservative, and I voted for LBJ over Goldwater in my first presidential vote.
I was in the Army from May 1966 to May 1968, and I clearly remember considering the virtue of my support of the war by volunteering for the draft versus some of my contemporaries who became protestors and activists. I reasoned that in a democratic republic when the majority votes to commit the nation to war, the citizenry, even those who doubt the consensus, should support it. I’m still not entirely confident I was right.
In 1980, I worked on the Presidential campaign of John B. Anderson, the Progressive Republican, who ran as an independent against Reagan and Carter. In 2016, in disgust with the rise of Donald Trump, I switched my registration to Democratic in the belief that independent voters were shirking their duties as citizens; you should be on one team or the other.
I identified as a center/lean when I started training as an analyst for Ad Fontes Media in 2019. When we analyze media, we do it as a triad: right, left, and center. One of the right/lean analysts I worked with bugged me about being an undercover liberal. Over the years with AFM, I've taken two or three rather extensive surveys that have placed me as a center/left politically. In my efforts to become a more dead-center centrist, I've read a lot of more conservative material, especially from the never-Trump conservatives like Jonah Goldberg.
In the months before the 2022 mid-term election, I decided that if I was going to be a virtuous center, I should disaffiliate from the Democratic Party. So, I registered as unaffiliated. Despite all that, I think I'm still a left-leaning centrist. Those commentators closest to my view include Rui Texaria, Chris Cillizza, Damon Linker, David Leonhardt, and Willian Galston.
A significant influence on my worldview is my identity as a Christian. I was raised in the Church of the Nazarene, an evangelical denomination in the Wesleyan tradition. I attended a Christian college. We Christians believe man is in a morally fallen condition, but each person is of incalculable value. In secular terms, that is what James Madison was getting at when he said in Federalist No. 51, “If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary.” I believe good governance is essential but never fully realized.
Welcome to Substack! (as if I have any presence here with which to welcome anyone)
I think Excessive Moderation is a good title.
Hi Dan-- thanks for setting down some stakes here on substack and expressing your views. As a former fellow Ad Fontes centrist, I share many of your views, although I'm a generation behind you.
I'm particularly interested in this musing that appears above, and think it would make for a longer, thoughtful post:
"I reasoned that in a democratic republic when the majority votes to commit the nation to war, the citizenry, even those who doubt the consensus, should support it. I’m still not entirely confident I was right."
Some things to take into consideration are; the errors of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution that rested on faulty intelligence reports; and the nature of current conflicts where a broad Authorization for the Use of Military Force covered all kinds of operations over a 20-year period, even those inside sovereign countries such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria or perhaps even in Venezuela.
Surrendering one's moral agency in the face of national security judgements by one man, the president for instance, i.e., George W. Bush's call to war in Iraq, despite the lack of insurgent activity in that country and the lack of Title 7 authorization for the use of military force by the U.N., is another case in point where citizens cannot be expected to be involuntarily summoned to wars abroad without a great deal more scrutiny and shoring up of the democratic republic's procedures. As I awaited "D" day in Qatar, I justified the call based on Bush's State of the Union Address. Indeed, by our rules, the call was his to make, and Bush said that he was not willing to risk Iraq becoming a nuclear-capable adversary...
If that were not enough to consider, soon our military forces may be expected to participate in police actions all over the United States to round up and deport those who are inside our country without authorization. So, the stakes are again very high, albeit not as high as with Viet Nam or other conflicts. Still, the people currently serving in our military signed up of their own volition to help protect and defend our country from all enemies. It's certainly not the case that all immigrants in the country can be considered enemies.
Perhaps the vaunted "Overton Window" will leave radical moderates like us not only joining the Democratic Party, but fully fledged "libs" notwithstanding our commitment to checks and balances and traditional Founder's logic. I hope not. I hope you can influence people to adopt more balanced views by explaining your thoughts here.
Good luck!